IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L
IUVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUQA.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - IUVL.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while IUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUVL.L returned 16.73%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for IUQA.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUVL.L achieves a 49.04% return, which is significantly higher than IUQA.L's 7.15% return.
IUVL.L
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 49.04%
- 6M
- 49.96%
- 1Y
- 86.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- —
IUQA.L
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUVL.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 49.04% | 33.10% | 6.39% | 14.59% | -14.87% | 29.80% | -1.49% | 25.93% | -12.11% | 21.68% |
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 7.15% | 12.46% | 22.48% | 30.95% | -20.74% | 27.56% | 16.09% | 33.33% | -6.91% | 50.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUVL.L and IUQA.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IUVL.L and IUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Financial Services
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Communication Services
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Industrials
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Healthcare
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Energy
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Utilities
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Real Estate
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Basic Materials
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUVL.L
IUQA.L
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUVL.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.83 | 1.31 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.15 | 2.49 | +7.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.60 | 10.62 | +28.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, which is greater than IUQA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVL.L and IUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUVL.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.73% | -33.96% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -7.96% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.93% | -18.03% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -27.77% | +1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.60% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -5.52% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.87% | +0.30% |
Volatility
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUVL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that IUVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUVL.L | IUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 3.54% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 8.79% | +6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 11.47% | +6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 16.34% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 30.83% | -11.78% |
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUVL.L and IUQA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUVL.L vs. IUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUVL.L nor IUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUVL.L and IUQA.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUVL.L and IUQA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IUVL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUVL.L tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.
Find the right allocation for IUVL.L and IUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer