PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUVL.L achieves a 46.45% return, which is significantly higher than EMVL.L's 43.83% return.


IUVL.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
15.82%
YTD
46.45%
6M
50.45%
1Y
89.18%
3Y*
33.44%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*

EMVL.L

1D
-2.57%
1M
10.78%
YTD
43.83%
6M
48.06%
1Y
85.89%
3Y*
37.66%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
46.45%33.07%6.49%14.53%-14.87%29.80%-1.49%25.42%
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
43.83%43.13%14.48%18.38%-16.29%5.29%7.16%17.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IUVL.L and EMVL.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.57

The correlation between IUVL.L and EMVL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUVL.L
EMVL.L

Technology

44.9%
44.7%

Financial Services

10.4%
13.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
1.7%

Communication Services

8.3%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
11.5%

Industrials

7.3%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.1%

Energy

3.2%
8.1%

Utilities

1.9%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
10.0%

Technology

IUVL.L
44.9%
EMVL.L
44.7%

Financial Services

IUVL.L
10.4%
EMVL.L
13.8%

Healthcare

IUVL.L
8.4%
EMVL.L
1.7%

Communication Services

IUVL.L
8.3%
EMVL.L
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IUVL.L
8.3%
EMVL.L
11.5%

Industrials

IUVL.L
7.3%
EMVL.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

IUVL.L
4.0%
EMVL.L
1.1%

Energy

IUVL.L
3.2%
EMVL.L
8.1%

Utilities

IUVL.L
1.9%
EMVL.L
1.4%

Real Estate

IUVL.L
1.8%
EMVL.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

IUVL.L
1.6%
EMVL.L
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUVL.L
IUVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IUVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUVL.LEMVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.92

1.69

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.48

7.25

+3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

43.31

25.10

+18.21

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.33, which is higher than the EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUVL.L and EMVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUVL.LEMVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33

4.07

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.81

-0.02

Drawdowns

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, which is greater than EMVL.L's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVL.L and EMVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUVL.LEMVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.73%

-34.95%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-11.65%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-16.43%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-34.57%

+7.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-4.20%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-9.98%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.39%

-1.34%

Volatility

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUVL.L) is 7.66%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that IUVL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUVL.LEMVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

9.56%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

17.52%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

20.79%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

20.00%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

22.24%

-3.27%

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUVL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMVL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUVL.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUVL.L nor EMVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUVL.L and EMVL.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUVL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUVL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMVL.L.

IUVL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EMVL.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IUVL.L tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVL.L and 0.40% for EMVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUVL.L and EMVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer