IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L
IUVF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUVF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUVF.L returned 16.49%/yr vs 4.24%/yr for MOAT.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUVF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOAT.L.
Performance
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUVF.L is traded in GBp, while MOAT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUVF.L achieves a 43.63% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's -2.54% return.
IUVF.L
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- 11.07%
- YTD
- 43.63%
- 6M
- 45.31%
- 1Y
- 85.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.71%
- 5Y*
- 16.49%
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -4.03%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 43.63% | 23.92% | 8.23% | 8.28% | -4.63% | 31.29% | -4.75% | 22.11% | -7.17% | 10.45% |
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | -2.54% | -0.31% | 13.06% | 12.45% | -9.03% | 26.72% | 10.28% | 28.69% | 4.20% | 11.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUVF.L and MOAT.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IUVF.L and MOAT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Financial Services
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Healthcare
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Communication Services
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Industrials
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Consumer Defensive
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Energy
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
-
Utilities
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
-
Real Estate
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Basic Materials
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUVF.L
MOAT.L
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUVF.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 1.12 | +0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.15 | 0.84 | +14.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 58.37 | 1.98 | +56.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUVF.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.61 | 0.68 | +4.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.27 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.75 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUVF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVF.L and MOAT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUVF.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -25.07% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.71% | -10.93% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -23.01% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -23.01% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -6.92% | +3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -4.45% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 4.63% | -3.14% |
Volatility
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that IUVF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUVF.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 3.58% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 9.68% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 13.48% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 15.60% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 16.93% | +1.01% |
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUVF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUVF.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUVF.L nor MOAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUVF.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUVF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUVF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.
IUVF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVF.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.
Find the right allocation for IUVF.L and MOAT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer