IUVF.L vs. GMOV
IUVF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS) and GMOV (GMO U.S. Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IUVF.L tracks the Russell 1000 Value TR USD while GMOV tracks the MSCI USA Value (Gross). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IUVF.L returned 90.82% vs 30.15% for GMOV. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUVF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GMOV.
Performance
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUVF.L is traded in GBp, while GMOV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GMOV values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUVF.L achieves a 46.62% return, which is significantly higher than GMOV's 11.86% return.
IUVF.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 16.86%
- YTD
- 46.62%
- 6M
- 49.54%
- 1Y
- 90.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.97%
- 10Y*
- —
GMOV
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 46.62% | 23.92% | 1.46% |
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF | 11.86% | 6.63% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUVF.L and GMOV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUVF.L vs. GMOV — Risk / Return Rank
IUVF.L
GMOV
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) and GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUVF.L | GMOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 1.49 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.82 | 6.48 | +9.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 61.43 | 22.99 | +38.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUVF.L | GMOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93 | 2.79 | +3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUVF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than GMOV's maximum drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVF.L and GMOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUVF.L | GMOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -19.10% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.71% | -4.67% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -4.68% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.32% | +0.15% |
Volatility
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) at 2.12%. This indicates that IUVF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUVF.L | GMOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 2.12% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 7.57% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 10.89% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.71% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 15.71% | +2.72% |
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUVF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUVF.L vs. GMOV - Dividend Comparison
IUVF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GMOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF | 2.00% | 1.98% | 0.30% |
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUVF.L and GMOV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUVF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUVF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOV.
IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while GMOV tracks MSCI USA Value (Gross). They also come from different issuers: iShares and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVF.L and 0.50% for GMOV.
Find the right allocation for IUVF.L and GMOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer