IUUS.L vs. SPES.L
IUUS.L (iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - IUUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities while SPES.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUUS.L returned 8.43%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for SPES.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUUS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPES.L.
Performance
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUUS.L is traded in USD, while SPES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUUS.L achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPES.L's 9.38% return.
IUUS.L
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SPES.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.37% | 15.80% | 22.91% | -8.06% | 2.07% | 11.75% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.38% | 11.79% | 11.76% | 13.89% | -11.89% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUUS.L and SPES.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.46 |
The correlation between IUUS.L and SPES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUUS.L
SPES.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IUUS.L
SPES.L
Basic Materials
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Communication Services
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Consumer Defensive
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Energy
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Financial Services
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Healthcare
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Industrials
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Real Estate
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Technology
IUUS.L
-
SPES.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUUS.L
SPES.L
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUUS.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.33 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.79 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 10.17 | -8.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUUS.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.93 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.69 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than SPES.L's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUUS.L and SPES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUUS.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -21.53% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -7.12% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -18.37% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -21.53% | -4.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.96% | 0.00% | -8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -5.21% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.96% | +2.24% |
Volatility
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) at 2.28%. This indicates that IUUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUUS.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 2.28% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 6.96% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 10.28% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 15.49% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 16.19% | +2.18% |
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPES.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUUS.L vs. SPES.L - Dividend Comparison
IUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.49% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUUS.L and SPES.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.
IUUS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities, while SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUUS.L and 0.20% for SPES.L.
Find the right allocation for IUUS.L and SPES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer