IUSV vs. ACWI
IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 12.30%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IUSV vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 12.30%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.
IUSV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
ACWI
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
IUSV vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 7.71% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 9.86% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSV and ACWI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IUSV and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSV vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSV
ACWI
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
IUSV
ACWI
Financial Services
IUSV
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
IUSV
ACWI
Healthcare
IUSV
ACWI
Industrials
IUSV
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
IUSV
ACWI
Energy
IUSV
ACWI
Utilities
IUSV
ACWI
Real Estate
IUSV
ACWI
Basic Materials
IUSV
ACWI
Communication Services
IUSV
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSV vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IUSV
ACWI
IUSV vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.64 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 11.51 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSV vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -56.00% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -9.73% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -16.55% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.95% | -26.42% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -33.53% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -2.83% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -8.59% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.23% | -0.56% |
Volatility
IUSV vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 3.03%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 5.57% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 11.38% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 13.64% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 16.20% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.08% | -0.04% |
IUSV vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSV vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than ACWI's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSV and ACWI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to IUSV (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 13.09% vs 12.30% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 13.09% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.45% for ACWI.
IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.32% for ACWI.
IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSV and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer