IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L
IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSQ.DE returned 12.55%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for ISLN.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUSQ.DE is traded in EUR, while ISLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than ISLN.L's -4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSQ.DE has underperformed ISLN.L with an annualized return of 12.55%, while ISLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 26.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 5.88%
- 1M
- -19.88%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 86.09%
- 3Y*
- 38.14%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.73% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 30.14% | -5.97% | 9.14% |
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -4.13% | 118.24% | 29.09% | -3.73% | 9.80% | -6.33% | 33.83% | 18.99% | -4.48% | -9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.13 |
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUSQ.DE
ISLN.L
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSQ.DE | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 2.05 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.29 | 4.60 | +11.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum ISLN.L drawdown of -68.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSQ.DE | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -68.32% | +34.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -42.05% | +35.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.25% | -42.05% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.25% | -42.05% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.60% | -42.05% | +8.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -38.64% | +37.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -42.65% | +38.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 18.75% | -17.17% |
Volatility
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) is 3.41%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 15.17%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSQ.DE | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 15.17% | -11.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 53.64% | -45.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 56.54% | -44.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 34.50% | -20.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 29.99% | -14.96% |
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSQ.DE vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSQ.DE nor ISLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IUSQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while ISLN.L is Silver. IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price.
Find the right allocation for IUSQ.DE and ISLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer