IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE
IUSN.DE (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSN.DE returned 7.95%/yr vs 18.79%/yr for XNAS.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSN.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSN.DE achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.
IUSN.DE
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 22.04%
- 1Y
- 39.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 16.07% | 7.76% | 13.17% | 13.12% | -13.76% | 17.84% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSN.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IUSN.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUSN.DE
XNAS.DE
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSN.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.77 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.61 | 11.16 | +5.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSN.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSN.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSN.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -31.25% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -10.00% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.25% | -26.72% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -31.25% | +7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.83% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -7.83% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 3.38% | -1.48% |
Volatility
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) is 3.90%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that IUSN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSN.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 4.31% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 10.91% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 15.71% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 19.88% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 19.85% | -1.54% |
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSN.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSN.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSN.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSN.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
IUSN.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. IUSN.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IUSN.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUSN.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer