PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUSN.DE is traded in EUR, while IWFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSN.DE achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than IWFQ.L's 10.28% return.


IUSN.DE

1D
2.38%
1M
3.44%
YTD
16.07%
6M
16.37%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

IWFQ.L

1D
1.18%
1M
2.78%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.32%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUSN.DE
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
16.07%7.76%13.17%13.12%-13.76%25.29%5.24%29.17%-8.13%
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
10.28%1.80%24.66%21.68%-14.21%33.31%4.90%33.87%-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSN.DE and IWFQ.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2018

0.76

The correlation between IUSN.DE and IWFQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSN.DE
IUSN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IUSN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IWFQ.L
IWFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSN.DEIWFQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

3.10

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.61

13.11

+3.50

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSN.DE and IWFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSN.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, roughly equal to the maximum IWFQ.L drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSN.DE and IWFQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSN.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-41.48%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-6.51%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.25%

-20.22%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-20.22%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-10.55%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.54%

+0.36%

Volatility

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) at 2.28%. This indicates that IUSN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSN.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.28%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

7.42%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

10.46%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

19.75%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

17.86%

+0.45%

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSN.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWFQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSN.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUSN.DE nor IWFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSN.DE and IWFQ.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWFQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.

IUSN.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap, while IWFQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IUSN.DE and 0.30% for IWFQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSN.DE and IWFQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer