IUSN.DE vs. ACWV
IUSN.DE (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap, while ACWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSN.DE returned 7.95%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for ACWV. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUSN.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.
Performance
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUSN.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSN.DE achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 4.46% return.
IUSN.DE
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWV
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 16.07% | 7.76% | 13.17% | 13.12% | -13.76% | 25.29% | 5.24% | 29.17% | -8.13% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 4.46% | -2.14% | 18.74% | 4.99% | -4.80% | 22.49% | -5.45% | 23.77% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSN.DE and ACWV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2018 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank
IUSN.DE
ACWV
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSN.DE | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.11 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 1.18 | +3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.61 | 3.02 | +13.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSN.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSN.DE and ACWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSN.DE | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -28.30% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -4.25% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.25% | -11.40% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -11.80% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.74% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -4.25% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.67% | +0.23% |
Volatility
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 1.76%. This indicates that IUSN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSN.DE | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 1.76% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 5.66% | +4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 7.83% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 10.15% | +6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 12.81% | +5.50% |
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSN.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSN.DE vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
IUSN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSN.DE and ACWV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
IUSN.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while ACWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUSN.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IUSN.DE and 0.20% for ACWV.
Find the right allocation for IUSN.DE and ACWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer