IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE
IUSL.DE (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF) and XG12.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - IUSL.DE tracks the Dow Jones Sustainability World ex Alcohol, Tobacco, Gambling and others while XG12.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IUSL.DE returned 14.71%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for XG12.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSL.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XG12.DE.
Performance
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSL.DE achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than XG12.DE's 39.92% return.
IUSL.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
XG12.DE
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 39.92%
- 6M
- 37.25%
- 1Y
- 53.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSL.DE iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF | 9.75% | 9.06% | 17.49% | 22.13% | -5.05% |
XG12.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C | 39.92% | 8.69% | -4.44% | -8.34% | -5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSL.DE and XG12.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IUSL.DE and XG12.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUSL.DE
XG12.DE
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSL.DE | XG12.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.59 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 7.95 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 25.46 | -14.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSL.DE | XG12.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 3.33 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.39 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, roughly equal to the maximum XG12.DE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSL.DE and XG12.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSL.DE | XG12.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.02% | -32.01% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -6.77% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -24.98% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.67% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -14.28% | +10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.12% | -0.22% |
Volatility
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) is 3.41%, while Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that IUSL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG12.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSL.DE | XG12.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 6.86% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 12.62% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 16.18% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 17.44% | -3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 17.44% | -2.51% |
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSL.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XG12.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSL.DE vs. XG12.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSL.DE nor XG12.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSL.DE and XG12.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XG12.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XG12.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IUSL.DE.
IUSL.DE tracks Dow Jones Sustainability World ex Alcohol, Tobacco, Gambling and others, while XG12.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IUSL.DE and 0.35% for XG12.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUSL.DE and XG12.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer