IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE).
IUSL.DE and IS3Q.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Sustainability World ex Alcohol, Tobacco, Gambling and others. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. IS3Q.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. Both IUSL.DE and IS3Q.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUSL.DE or IS3Q.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between IUSL.DE and IS3Q.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IUSL.DE:
1.65
IS3Q.DE:
1.68
IUSL.DE:
2.28
IS3Q.DE:
2.38
IUSL.DE:
1.31
IS3Q.DE:
1.32
IUSL.DE:
2.40
IS3Q.DE:
2.51
IUSL.DE:
10.81
IS3Q.DE:
10.24
IUSL.DE:
1.63%
IS3Q.DE:
1.95%
IUSL.DE:
10.68%
IS3Q.DE:
11.90%
IUSL.DE:
-33.02%
IS3Q.DE:
-32.31%
IUSL.DE:
-0.29%
IS3Q.DE:
-0.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSL.DE achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than IS3Q.DE's 4.05% return.
IUSL.DE
4.40%
3.57%
12.25%
16.52%
10.77%
N/A
IS3Q.DE
4.05%
3.27%
12.60%
18.79%
11.90%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSL.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3Q.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IUSL.DE
IS3Q.DE
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSL.DE nor IS3Q.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, roughly equal to the maximum IS3Q.DE drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSL.DE and IS3Q.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUSL.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) is 3.62%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that IUSL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.