PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSL.DE achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSL.DE having a 12.35% annualized return and IUSQ.DE not far ahead at 12.38%.


IUSL.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.28%
YTD
9.75%
6M
10.59%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
12.35%

IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.68%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSL.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF
9.75%9.06%17.49%22.13%-12.66%32.00%3.12%29.77%-4.73%7.79%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.65%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSL.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.87

The correlation between IUSL.DE and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSL.DE
IUSL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IUSL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSL.DEIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

4.08

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

16.69

-5.67

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSL.DE and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSL.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.31

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.88

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.82

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.76

-0.05

Drawdowns

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.02%, roughly equal to the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSL.DE and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSL.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.02%

-33.60%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-6.48%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

-21.25%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.43%

-21.25%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.02%

-33.60%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.55%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-4.19%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.59%

+0.31%

Volatility

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IUSL.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that IUSL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSL.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.03%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

8.26%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

11.47%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.53%

13.94%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

15.02%

-0.09%

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSL.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSL.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUSL.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSL.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IUSL.DE.

IUSL.DE tracks Dow Jones Sustainability World ex Alcohol, Tobacco, Gambling and others, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IUSL.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSL.DE and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer