PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUSA.L (iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSA.L returned 16.52%/yr vs 22.43%/yr for CNX1.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.

Performance

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSA.L achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSA.L has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 16.52%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.43% annualized return.

IUSA.L

1D
0.04%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.05%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
16.52%

CNX1.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
8.17%
YTD
19.85%
6M
17.68%
1Y
40.87%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
22.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist		10.67%9.70%27.73%20.24%-8.72%31.54%14.15%27.06%0.51%11.19%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		19.85%11.57%28.51%47.71%-25.53%29.50%43.24%33.63%4.62%20.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSA.L and CNX1.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.88

The correlation between IUSA.L and CNX1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IUSA.L
CNX1.L

Technology

38.2%
57.3%

Financial Services

11.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.9%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.3%
3.8%

Industrials

7.9%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
6.9%

Energy

3.2%
0.5%

Utilities

2.2%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Technology

IUSA.L
38.2%
CNX1.L
57.3%

Financial Services

IUSA.L
11.1%
CNX1.L
0.2%

Communication Services

IUSA.L
10.9%
CNX1.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSA.L
10.0%
CNX1.L
11.6%

Healthcare

IUSA.L
8.3%
CNX1.L
3.8%

Industrials

IUSA.L
7.9%
CNX1.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

IUSA.L
4.7%
CNX1.L
6.9%

Energy

IUSA.L
3.2%
CNX1.L
0.5%

Utilities

IUSA.L
2.2%
CNX1.L
1.3%

Real Estate

IUSA.L
1.9%
CNX1.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

IUSA.L
1.7%
CNX1.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with IUSA.L:
IUSA.L vs. CSP1.LIUSA.L vs. VUAA.LIUSA.L vs. IAPD.ASIUSA.L vs. SPX5.LIUSA.L vs. SPXP.LIUSA.L vs. VOOIUSA.L vs. IVV
Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE

Return for Risk

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUSA.L
IUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUSA.LCNX1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.82
2.82

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.78
3.72

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.50

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

3.76

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

11.10

+4.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSA.L and CNX1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUSA.LCNX1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.82

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.98

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

1.16

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.14

-0.56

Drawdowns

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSA.L and CNX1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUSA.LCNX1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.58%

-27.56%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-11.03%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-24.56%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-27.56%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-27.56%

+2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.63%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-4.57%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.75%

-1.85%

Volatility

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) is 2.62%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that IUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUSA.LCNX1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.13%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

10.38%

-3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

14.70%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

19.16%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

19.44%

-3.84%

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUSA.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison

IUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist		1.15%1.24%1.28%1.55%1.74%1.39%1.80%1.96%2.22%1.95%1.75%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.92, IUSA.L and CNX1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.

IUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. IUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IUSA.L and 0.36% for CNX1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSA.L and CNX1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer