PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS7.DE achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than EMIE.DE's -0.43% return.


IUS7.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.33%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
3.08%

EMIE.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUS7.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.97%1.14%11.74%6.77%-13.16%5.75%-4.03%3.18%
EMIE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.43%7.05%-0.36%3.88%-19.72%-2.93%6.95%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS7.DE and EMIE.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between IUS7.DE and EMIE.DE has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS7.DE
IUS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IUS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIE.DE
EMIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUS7.DEEMIE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.12

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

3.63

+5.55

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS7.DE and EMIE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUS7.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.07

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

-0.34

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.11

+0.72

Drawdowns

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.13%, roughly equal to the maximum EMIE.DE drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS7.DE and EMIE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS7.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.13%

-26.98%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-3.53%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-6.97%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.90%

-25.83%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.02%

+14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-12.69%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.09%

-0.08%

Volatility

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS7.DEEMIE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.28%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

2.83%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.97%

3.73%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

6.67%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.02%

7.95%

+3.07%

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS7.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIE.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUS7.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, while EMIE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIE.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUS7.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.80%6.10%5.62%5.77%5.63%3.80%4.17%4.72%4.70%5.11%5.29%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS7.DE and EMIE.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIE.DE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IUS7.DE.

IUS7.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core, while EMIE.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IUS7.DE and 0.43% for EMIE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS7.DE and EMIE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer