PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS5.DE achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than SXR1.DE's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IUS5.DE has underperformed SXR1.DE with an annualized return of 0.80%, while SXR1.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.48% annualized return.


IUS5.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.47%
YTD
2.13%
6M
1.36%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
-1.37%
10Y*
0.80%

SXR1.DE

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.90%
6M
10.33%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
7.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUS5.DE
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.13%-3.37%2.59%1.53%-17.29%12.12%2.24%10.07%0.53%-4.84%
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.90%7.00%11.91%2.20%-0.86%13.17%-2.98%21.74%-6.20%10.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.09

The correlation between IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS5.DE
IUS5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IUS5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SXR1.DE
SXR1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUS5.DESXR1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.25

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

6.64

-4.97

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUS5.DESXR1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

1.19

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.39

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.45

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.27

+0.16

Drawdowns

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS5.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum SXR1.DE drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS5.DESXR1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-38.62%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-6.21%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.42%

-20.28%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.31%

-20.28%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

-36.91%

+14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.45%

-2.17%

-15.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-9.79%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

2.11%

-0.90%

Volatility

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS5.DE) is 1.90%, while iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that IUS5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXR1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS5.DESXR1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

3.06%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

9.04%

-5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02%

11.73%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

14.73%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

16.60%

-8.66%

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUS5.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUS5.DE nor SXR1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IUS5.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SXR1.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. IUS5.DE tracks Bloomberg World Government Inflation-Linked Bond, while SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS5.DE and SXR1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer