PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUS4.DE having a 19.30% return and XM1D.DE slightly higher at 19.51%.


IUS4.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
2.78%
YTD
19.30%
6M
19.76%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
8.07%

XM1D.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.82%
YTD
19.51%
6M
19.67%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IUS4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.30%15.97%9.46%5.63%
XM1D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
19.51%12.60%13.72%-86.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS4.DE and XM1D.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2023

0.82

The correlation between IUS4.DE and XM1D.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS4.DE
IUS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IUS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XM1D.DE
XM1D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XM1D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUS4.DEXM1D.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.50

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

5.53

+6.20

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the XM1D.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS4.DE and XM1D.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS4.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.61%, smaller than the maximum XM1D.DE drawdown of -88.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS4.DE and XM1D.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS4.DEXM1D.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.61%

-88.37%

+36.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-15.14%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.92%

-16.92%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-79.76%

+79.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-84.93%

+69.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

6.84%

-3.91%

Volatility

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) is 3.82%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that IUS4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XM1D.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS4.DEXM1D.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

6.26%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

16.10%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

28.50%

-12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

52.46%

-37.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

52.46%

-36.54%

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS4.DE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XM1D.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUS4.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUS4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than XM1D.DE's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.62%1.88%1.70%1.77%2.10%1.47%1.60%1.45%1.41%1.31%1.15%0.70%
XM1D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
1.45%1.71%2.68%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS4.DE and XM1D.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XM1D.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XM1D.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IUS4.DE.

IUS4.DE tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap, while XM1D.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for IUS4.DE and 0.12% for XM1D.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS4.DE and XM1D.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer