PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUQA.L is traded in USD, while SUUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQA.L achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than SUUS.L's 13.86% return.


IUQA.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.02%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*

SUUS.L

1D
0.18%
1M
2.03%
YTD
13.86%
6M
13.73%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUQA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
7.15%12.46%22.48%30.95%-20.74%27.56%16.09%33.33%-6.91%50.23%
SUUS.L
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.86%11.25%13.92%23.78%-18.70%31.68%25.25%32.47%-2.94%23.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQA.L and SUUS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016

0.81

The correlation between IUQA.L and SUUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUQA.L
SUUS.L

Technology

38.8%
38.4%

Communication Services

11.8%
9.7%

Financial Services

10.8%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.3%

Industrials

7.2%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.3%

Energy

3.2%
0.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

IUQA.L
38.8%
SUUS.L
38.4%

Communication Services

IUQA.L
11.8%
SUUS.L
9.7%

Financial Services

IUQA.L
10.8%
SUUS.L
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IUQA.L
9.3%
SUUS.L
10.6%

Healthcare

IUQA.L
8.7%
SUUS.L
9.3%

Industrials

IUQA.L
7.2%
SUUS.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUQA.L
4.4%
SUUS.L
5.3%

Energy

IUQA.L
3.2%
SUUS.L
0.3%

Utilities

IUQA.L
2.1%
SUUS.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

IUQA.L
1.9%
SUUS.L
1.8%

Real Estate

IUQA.L
1.8%
SUUS.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQA.L
IUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SUUS.L
SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUQA.LSUUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.57

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

9.93

+0.70

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQA.L and SUUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SUUS.L drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQA.L and SUUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUQA.LSUUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-32.59%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.96%

-8.93%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.03%

-19.94%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.77%

-26.32%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-1.20%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-7.47%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.32%

-0.45%

Volatility

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) is 3.54%, while iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that IUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUQA.LSUUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.31%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

9.93%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

12.60%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

21.17%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.83%

20.59%

+10.24%

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUQA.L and SUUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUQA.L vs. SUUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUQA.L nor SUUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUQA.L and SUUS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUQA.L and SUUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while SUUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQA.L and SUUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer