PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUQA.L having a 9.47% return and LGUS.L slightly lower at 9.01%.


IUQA.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
0.11%
6M
7.42%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*

LGUS.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.36%
6M
8.07%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUQA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
9.47%12.46%22.48%30.95%-20.74%27.56%16.09%33.33%-11.08%
LGUS.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.01%17.98%25.09%28.66%-20.46%27.91%21.16%30.91%-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQA.L and LGUS.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.93

The correlation between IUQA.L and LGUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQA.L
IUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUS.L
LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUQA.LLGUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.30

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

8.84

+1.43

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQA.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQA.L and LGUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUQA.LLGUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-34.26%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.96%

-8.58%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.03%

-19.46%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.77%

-25.64%

-2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.69%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-5.29%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.23%

-0.35%

Volatility

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUQA.LLGUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.15%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

9.50%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

12.53%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.52%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.74%

18.10%

+12.64%

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUQA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUQA.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUQA.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUQA.L and LGUS.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQA.L.

IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQA.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQA.L and LGUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer