IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L
IUMO.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SDHA.L (iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMO.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while SDHA.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMO.L returned 14.09%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for SDHA.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMO.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SDHA.L.
Performance
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMO.L achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than SDHA.L's 1.56% return.
IUMO.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 12.05%
- YTD
- 29.52%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 32.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SDHA.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- —
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMO.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 29.52% | 17.81% | 31.88% | 9.83% | -18.15% | 12.60% | 29.61% | 28.49% | -9.76% |
SDHA.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.56% | 8.87% | 6.63% | 8.90% | -3.48% | 3.62% | 3.98% | 9.51% | -0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMO.L and SDHA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IUMO.L and SDHA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Industrials
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Healthcare
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Financial Services
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Communication Services
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Energy
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Basic Materials
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
-
Utilities
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
Real Estate
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMO.L
SDHA.L
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMO.L | SDHA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.82 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.44 | 17.08 | -2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMO.L | SDHA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.13 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.85 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.75 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than SDHA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMO.L and SDHA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMO.L | SDHA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.75% | -17.77% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -1.85% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.01% | -4.57% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.98% | -8.30% | -23.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -0.07% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -1.25% | -7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 0.41% | +2.29% |
Volatility
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) at 1.32%. This indicates that IUMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMO.L | SDHA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 1.32% | +7.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 2.69% | +13.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 3.33% | +15.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 5.49% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 6.39% | +14.14% |
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SDHA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUMO.L nor SDHA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMO.L and SDHA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUMO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHA.L.
IUMO.L is categorized as Momentum, while SDHA.L is High Yield Bonds. IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMO.L and 0.45% for SDHA.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMO.L and SDHA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer