PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMO.L achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than SDHA.L's 1.56% return.


IUMO.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
12.05%
YTD
29.52%
6M
29.75%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
32.22%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

SDHA.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.56%
6M
2.20%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUMO.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc
29.52%17.81%31.88%9.83%-18.15%12.60%29.61%28.49%-9.76%
SDHA.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.56%8.87%6.63%8.90%-3.48%3.62%3.98%9.51%-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMO.L and SDHA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018

0.52

The correlation between IUMO.L and SDHA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUMO.L
SDHA.L

Technology

42.9%

-

Industrials

19.2%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Financial Services

7.3%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%

-

Energy

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.5%
77.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
22.1%

Technology

IUMO.L
42.9%
SDHA.L

-

Industrials

IUMO.L
19.2%
SDHA.L

-

Healthcare

IUMO.L
9.6%
SDHA.L

-

Financial Services

IUMO.L
7.3%
SDHA.L

-

Communication Services

IUMO.L
6.7%
SDHA.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUMO.L
5.1%
SDHA.L

-

Energy

IUMO.L
2.5%
SDHA.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUMO.L
2.2%
SDHA.L

-

Basic Materials

IUMO.L
1.9%
SDHA.L

-

Utilities

IUMO.L
1.5%
SDHA.L
77.9%

Real Estate

IUMO.L
1.1%
SDHA.L
22.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMO.L
IUMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SDHA.L
SDHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) and iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUMO.LSDHA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.82

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.44

17.08

-2.64

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMO.L and SDHA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUMO.LSDHA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.13

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.85

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.75

+0.21

Drawdowns

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than SDHA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMO.L and SDHA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMO.LSDHA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-17.77%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-1.85%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-4.57%

-16.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-8.30%

-23.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-0.07%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-1.25%

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.41%

+2.29%

Volatility

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUMO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) at 1.32%. This indicates that IUMO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMO.LSDHA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

1.32%

+7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

2.69%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.28%

3.33%

+15.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

5.49%

+14.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.53%

6.39%

+14.14%

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SDHA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUMO.L vs. SDHA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUMO.L nor SDHA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUMO.L and SDHA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUMO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHA.L.

IUMO.L is categorized as Momentum, while SDHA.L is High Yield Bonds. IUMO.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMO.L and 0.45% for SDHA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMO.L and SDHA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer