IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L
IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMF.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMF.L returned 15.74%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for SWRD.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SWRD.L.
Performance
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUMF.L is traded in GBp, while SWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SWRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 32.21% return, which is significantly higher than SWRD.L's 10.47% return.
IUMF.L
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 18.47%
- YTD
- 32.21%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- 1Y
- 43.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 32.21% | 9.14% | 34.88% | 3.73% | -8.43% | 14.11% | 25.03% | 15.38% |
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.22% | 12.46% | 21.34% | 18.20% | -8.04% | 23.27% | 12.48% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMF.L and SWRD.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IUMF.L and SWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Industrials
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Healthcare
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Financial Services
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Communication Services
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Energy
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Basic Materials
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Utilities
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Real Estate
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMF.L
SWRD.L
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMF.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.66 | 4.26 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 16.13 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMF.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.38 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.92 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum SWRD.L drawdown of -26.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and SWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMF.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -26.90% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -6.47% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -18.71% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -18.71% | -5.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -3.22% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.71% | +1.18% |
Volatility
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) at 3.40%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMF.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 3.40% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 8.79% | +6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 11.60% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 14.37% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 16.41% | +2.24% |
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUMF.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUMF.L nor SWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMF.L and SWRD.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUMF.L.
IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while SWRD.L is Large Cap Growth Equities. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.12% for SWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and SWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer