IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L
IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and EQQD.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMF.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMF.L returned 15.68%/yr vs 17.34%/yr for EQQD.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUMF.L is traded in GBp, while EQQD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 36.10% return, which is significantly higher than EQQD.L's 18.86% return.
IUMF.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 36.10%
- 6M
- 34.90%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
EQQD.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 38.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- —
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 36.10% | 9.14% | 34.88% | 3.74% | -8.43% | 13.36% |
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 18.86% | 11.36% | 28.95% | 48.81% | -25.39% | 19.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQD.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Industrials
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Energy
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Financial Services
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Communication Services
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Healthcare
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Basic Materials
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Utilities
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Real Estate
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMF.L
EQQD.L
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUMF.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 3.41 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 9.54 | +6.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum EQQD.L drawdown of -27.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and EQQD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMF.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -27.45% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -11.10% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -24.40% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -27.45% | +3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -2.48% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -7.26% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.98% | -0.99% |
Volatility
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) at 6.66%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMF.L | EQQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 6.66% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 12.83% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.40% | 16.71% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 20.15% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.78% | 20.13% | +19.65% |
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUMF.L and EQQD.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Dividend Comparison
IUMF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.31% |
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMF.L and EQQD.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMF.L and EQQD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while EQQD.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and EQQD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer