PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUMF.L is traded in GBp, while EQQD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 36.10% return, which is significantly higher than EQQD.L's 18.86% return.


IUMF.L

1D
0.36%
1M
10.89%
YTD
36.10%
6M
34.90%
1Y
47.38%
3Y*
30.99%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*

EQQD.L

1D
0.41%
1M
1.50%
YTD
18.86%
6M
18.41%
1Y
38.06%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
36.10%9.14%34.88%3.74%-8.43%13.36%
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
18.86%11.36%28.95%48.81%-25.39%19.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQD.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021

0.72

The correlation between IUMF.L and EQQD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUMF.L
EQQD.L

Technology

50.0%
53.7%

Industrials

16.5%
3.1%

Energy

7.0%
0.6%

Financial Services

6.4%
0.2%

Communication Services

5.2%
15.8%

Healthcare

4.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
12.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.1%

Utilities

1.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Technology

IUMF.L
50.0%
EQQD.L
53.7%

Industrials

IUMF.L
16.5%
EQQD.L
3.1%

Energy

IUMF.L
7.0%
EQQD.L
0.6%

Financial Services

IUMF.L
6.4%
EQQD.L
0.2%

Communication Services

IUMF.L
5.2%
EQQD.L
15.8%

Healthcare

IUMF.L
4.8%
EQQD.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

IUMF.L
3.3%
EQQD.L
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMF.L
2.6%
EQQD.L
12.2%

Basic Materials

IUMF.L
2.1%
EQQD.L
1.1%

Utilities

IUMF.L
1.1%
EQQD.L
1.4%

Real Estate

IUMF.L
1.0%
EQQD.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMF.L
IUMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQD.L
EQQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUMF.LEQQD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

3.41

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

9.54

+6.27

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMF.L and EQQD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum EQQD.L drawdown of -27.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and EQQD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUMF.LEQQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-27.45%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-11.10%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-24.40%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-27.45%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.48%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-7.26%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.98%

-0.99%

Volatility

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) at 6.66%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUMF.LEQQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.55%

6.66%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

12.83%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.40%

16.71%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.24%

20.15%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.78%

20.13%

+19.65%

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUMF.L and EQQD.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUMF.L vs. EQQD.L - Dividend Comparison

IUMF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
0.59%0.64%0.75%0.75%0.95%0.31%
IUMF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUMF.L and EQQD.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMF.L and EQQD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while EQQD.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMF.L and EQQD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer