IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMF.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMF.L returned 15.33%/yr vs 16.35%/yr for EQGB.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.

Performance

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 29.89% return, which is significantly higher than EQGB.L's 18.86% return.

IUMF.L

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: 13.21%
• YTD: 29.89%
• 6M: 29.09%
• 1Y: 40.90%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: 15.33%
• 10Y*: —

EQGB.L

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 8.42%
• YTD: 18.86%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 39.13%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 16.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF	29.89%	9.14%	34.88%	3.73%	-8.43%	14.11%	25.03%	23.31%	2.39%	3.93%
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	18.86%	19.59%	26.12%	53.92%	-35.07%	27.68%	45.43%	34.93%	-2.60%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMF.L and EQGB.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017	0.70

The correlation between IUMF.L and EQGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUMF.L	EQGB.L
Technology	42.9%	53.6%
Industrials	19.2%	3.1%
Healthcare	9.6%	4.2%
Financial Services	7.3%	0.2%
Communication Services	6.7%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	12.2%
Energy	2.5%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	7.7%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.1%
Utilities	1.5%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMF.L

IUMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IUMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IUMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
IUMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IUMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

EQGB.L

EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUMF.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.46	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.41	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	3.44	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.10	12.32	+1.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMF.L and EQGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUMF.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.46	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.78	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.91	-0.07

Drawdowns

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and EQGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUMF.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.23%	-36.77%	+11.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-11.33%	+2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.56%	-22.76%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.37%	-36.77%	+12.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-0.81%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-7.52%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	3.17%	-0.28%

Volatility

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) at 4.92%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUMF.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.86%	4.92%	+2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.09%	11.88%	+3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	15.81%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.29%	20.95%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	21.25%	-2.59%

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUMF.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUMF.L nor EQGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUMF.L and EQGB.L in my portfolio?

IUMF.L and EQGB.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUMF.L or EQGB.L?

On fees, IUMF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUMF.L or EQGB.L?

IUMF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.

What is the main difference between IUMF.L and EQGB.L?

IUMF.L is categorized as Momentum, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMF.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.