IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUMD.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMD.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IUMD.L returned 32.20%/yr vs 28.10%/yr for XNAS.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMD.L achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than XNAS.L's 19.67% return.

IUMD.L

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 11.97%
• YTD: 29.46%
• 6M: 29.72%
• 1Y: 39.40%
• 3Y*: 32.20%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: —

XNAS.L

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 8.53%
• YTD: 19.67%
• 6M: 19.16%
• 1Y: 40.41%
• 3Y*: 28.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	29.46%	17.13%	32.70%	9.78%	4.79%
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	19.67%	19.83%	26.60%	56.41%	-1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMD.L and XNAS.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022	0.79

The correlation between IUMD.L and XNAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUMD.L	XNAS.L
Technology	42.9%	53.7%
Industrials	19.2%	3.1%
Healthcare	9.6%	4.2%
Financial Services	7.3%	0.2%
Communication Services	6.7%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	12.2%
Energy	2.5%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	7.7%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.1%
Utilities	1.5%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUMD.L

IUMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
IUMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IUMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IUMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IUMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IUMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XNAS.L

XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUMD.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.54	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.51	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.44	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	3.67	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.47	13.19	+1.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMD.L and XNAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUMD.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.54	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	1.69	-0.97

Drawdowns

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMD.L and XNAS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUMD.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.67%	-22.92%	-10.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.63%	-10.91%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.57%	-22.92%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-0.76%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.75%	-3.03%	-5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	3.05%	-0.34%

Volatility

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that IUMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUMD.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.70%	4.96%	+3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.78%	11.72%	+5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.45%	15.78%	+3.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.62%	19.39%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.47%	19.39%	+1.08%

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUMD.L and XNAS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUMD.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison

IUMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.67%	0.87%	0.50%	1.14%	1.41%	0.40%	0.67%	1.13%	0.85%
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUMD.L and XNAS.L in my portfolio?

IUMD.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUMD.L or XNAS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUMD.L or XNAS.L?

IUMD.L and XNAS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between IUMD.L and XNAS.L?

IUMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMD.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.