IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L
IUMD.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMD.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while IWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMD.L returned 14.09%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for IWDA.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUMD.L achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 9.83% return.
IUMD.L
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 29.72%
- 1Y
- 39.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 29.46% | 17.13% | 32.70% | 9.78% | -18.13% | 12.60% | 29.52% | 27.26% | -8.17% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.83% | 21.03% | 19.11% | 24.27% | -18.11% | 22.19% | 16.06% | 27.13% | -9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUMD.L and IWDA.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IUMD.L and IWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Industrials
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Healthcare
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Financial Services
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Communication Services
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Energy
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Basic Materials
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Utilities
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Real Estate
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUMD.L
IWDA.L
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUMD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 3.11 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | 13.16 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUMD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.17 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.76 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.79 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMD.L and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUMD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -34.11% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -8.31% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.57% | -16.94% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.87% | -25.88% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -0.43% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -4.44% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 1.97% | +0.74% |
Volatility
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.40%. This indicates that IUMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUMD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 3.40% | +5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 9.19% | +7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 11.93% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 15.68% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 15.91% | +4.56% |
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUMD.L and IWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUMD.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
IUMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUMD.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.67% | 0.87% | 0.50% | 1.14% | 1.41% | 0.40% | 0.67% | 1.13% | 0.85% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUMD.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUMD.L and IWDA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IUMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. IUMD.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net).
Find the right allocation for IUMD.L and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer