PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUMD.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUMD.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMD.L returned 14.09%/yr vs 17.61%/yr for CNDX.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUMD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.

Performance

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMD.L achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 19.65% return.

IUMD.L

1D
-1.92%
1M
11.97%
YTD
29.46%
6M
29.72%
1Y
39.40%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
—

CNDX.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
8.52%
YTD
19.65%
6M
19.10%
1Y
40.28%
3Y*
27.98%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
21.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		29.46%17.13%32.70%9.78%-18.13%12.60%29.52%27.26%-8.17%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		19.65%19.75%26.45%56.31%-33.45%27.96%48.33%38.07%-6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMD.L and CNDX.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018

0.83

The correlation between IUMD.L and CNDX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IUMD.L
CNDX.L

Technology

42.9%
57.3%

Industrials

19.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

9.6%
3.8%

Financial Services

7.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
11.6%

Energy

2.5%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
6.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.1%

Utilities

1.5%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.1%

Technology

IUMD.L
42.9%
CNDX.L
57.3%

Industrials

IUMD.L
19.2%
CNDX.L
2.8%

Healthcare

IUMD.L
9.6%
CNDX.L
3.8%

Financial Services

IUMD.L
7.3%
CNDX.L
0.2%

Communication Services

IUMD.L
6.7%
CNDX.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMD.L
5.1%
CNDX.L
11.6%

Energy

IUMD.L
2.5%
CNDX.L
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUMD.L
2.2%
CNDX.L
6.9%

Basic Materials

IUMD.L
1.9%
CNDX.L
1.1%

Utilities

IUMD.L
1.5%
CNDX.L
1.3%

Real Estate

IUMD.L
1.1%
CNDX.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with IUMD.L:
IUMD.L vs. IUMF.LIUMD.L vs. IWFM.LIUMD.L vs. JMOMIUMD.L vs. SPMOIUMD.L vs. SCHGIUMD.L vs. IITU.LIUMD.L vs. SPHQ
Often compared with CNDX.L:
CNDX.L vs. QQQCNDX.L vs. EQQQ.DECNDX.L vs. SXRV.DECNDX.L vs. CNX1.LCNDX.L vs. CSPX.LCNDX.L vs. EQQU.LCNDX.L vs. VWRA.L

Return for Risk

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUMD.L
IUMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IUMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUMD.LCNDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.02
2.52

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.98
3.50

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.61

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

13.03

+1.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMD.L and CNDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUMD.LCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.52

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.07

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.12

-0.41

Drawdowns

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMD.L and CNDX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUMD.LCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-35.17%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-11.00%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-22.44%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.87%

-35.17%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.17%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.76%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-5.30%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.07%

-0.36%

Volatility

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) at 4.90%. This indicates that IUMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUMD.LCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

4.90%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

11.88%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

15.79%

+3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

20.87%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

20.07%

+0.40%

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUMD.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

IUMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.02%0.05%0.06%0.03%0.04%0.07%0.06%0.30%0.16%0.16%
IUMD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		0.67%0.87%0.50%1.14%1.41%0.40%0.67%1.13%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IUMD.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUMD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUMD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.

IUMD.L is categorized as Momentum, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. IUMD.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUMD.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMD.L and CNDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer