PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUIT.L is traded in USD, while WTCH.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WTCH.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUIT.L having a 23.04% return and WTCH.AS slightly higher at 24.02%. Over the past 10 years, IUIT.L has outperformed WTCH.AS with an annualized return of 26.33%, while WTCH.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 24.26% annualized return.


IUIT.L

1D
-2.11%
1M
13.14%
YTD
23.04%
6M
22.75%
1Y
51.87%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.33%

WTCH.AS

1D
-1.83%
1M
14.05%
YTD
24.02%
6M
23.60%
1Y
51.21%
3Y*
32.78%
5Y*
21.35%
10Y*
24.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.04%22.93%38.51%59.45%-29.15%34.09%43.14%48.90%-1.41%38.43%
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
24.02%22.97%34.52%53.80%-32.01%31.28%43.46%46.53%-2.84%38.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IUIT.L and WTCH.AS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2016

0.92

The correlation between IUIT.L and WTCH.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

WTCH.AS
WTCH.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUIT.LWTCH.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.09

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

9.53

-0.55

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUIT.L and WTCH.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUIT.LWTCH.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.48

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.90

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

1.10

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Drawdowns

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUIT.L drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum WTCH.AS drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIT.L and WTCH.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUIT.LWTCH.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-36.03%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-16.32%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

-26.58%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.46%

-36.03%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-36.03%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-2.61%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-6.39%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

5.33%

+0.43%

Volatility

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) at 7.13%. This indicates that IUIT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTCH.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUIT.LWTCH.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

7.13%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

15.34%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.28%

20.38%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

23.29%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.47%

21.79%

+0.68%

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUIT.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WTCH.AS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUIT.L vs. WTCH.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUIT.L nor WTCH.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IUIT.L and WTCH.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WTCH.AS.

IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIT.L and 0.30% for WTCH.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUIT.L and WTCH.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer