IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L
IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDWE.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) are both S&P 500 funds - IUIS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index while XDWE.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUIS.L returned 13.82%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for XDWE.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUIS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XDWE.L.
Performance
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUIS.L is traded in USD, while XDWE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDWE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUIS.L achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than XDWE.L's 10.57% return.
IUIS.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 18.44%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWE.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.44% | 19.17% | 17.53% | 17.86% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -12.85% | 14.96% |
XDWE.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 10.57% | 11.79% | 12.16% | 13.47% | -11.89% | 30.18% | 11.20% | 28.85% | -9.06% | 14.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUIS.L and XDWE.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IUIS.L and XDWE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
Utilities
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
Technology
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
Basic Materials
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
Communication Services
IUIS.L
-
XDWE.L
Consumer Defensive
IUIS.L
-
XDWE.L
Energy
IUIS.L
-
XDWE.L
Financial Services
IUIS.L
-
XDWE.L
Healthcare
IUIS.L
-
XDWE.L
Real Estate
IUIS.L
-
XDWE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUIS.L
XDWE.L
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUIS.L | XDWE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.79 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.76 | 10.04 | +0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, smaller than the maximum XDWE.L drawdown of -98.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUIS.L and XDWE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUIS.L | XDWE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.18% | -98.45% | +56.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -7.08% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -19.08% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -21.62% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -5.01% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.97% | +0.75% |
Volatility
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) at 2.46%. This indicates that IUIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUIS.L | XDWE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.46% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 7.19% | +5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 10.44% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 20.60% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 19.43% | +0.08% |
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUIS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUIS.L vs. XDWE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUIS.L nor XDWE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUIS.L and XDWE.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.
IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUIS.L and 0.20% for XDWE.L.
Find the right allocation for IUIS.L and XDWE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer