PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUHC.L is traded in USD, while GXLV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with IUHC.L at -2.09% and GXLV.L at -2.09%.


IUHC.L

1D
3.00%
1M
4.72%
YTD
-2.09%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
9.20%

GXLV.L

1D
3.02%
1M
4.77%
YTD
-2.09%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.09%14.67%2.16%1.72%-0.85%
GXLV.L
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
-2.09%14.98%1.79%1.36%-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IUHC.L and GXLV.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.48

The correlation between IUHC.L and GXLV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLV.L
GXLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GXLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUHC.LGXLV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.21

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

4.88

-1.31

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the GXLV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUHC.L and GXLV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUHC.LGXLV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.29

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.37

+0.20

Drawdowns

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUHC.L drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than GXLV.L's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUHC.L and GXLV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUHC.LGXLV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-17.58%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-10.45%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.63%

-17.58%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-4.72%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-6.19%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

7.67%

-3.47%

Volatility

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUHC.LGXLV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.91%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

11.87%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

17.95%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

21.66%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

21.66%

-5.95%

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUHC.L and GXLV.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUHC.L vs. GXLV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUHC.L nor GXLV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUHC.L and GXLV.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUHC.L and GXLV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index, while GXLV.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUHC.L and GXLV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer