GXLV.L vs. KURE.L
GXLV.L (SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF) and KURE.L (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index UCITS ETF USD) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, from State Street and MLC Management respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GXLV.L returned 16.12% vs -10.03% for KURE.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXLV.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KURE.L.
Performance
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GXLV.L is traded in GBP, while KURE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KURE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLV.L achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly higher than KURE.L's -10.32% return.
GXLV.L
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KURE.L
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- YTD
- -10.32%
- 6M
- -20.07%
- 1Y
- -10.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLV.L SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF | -1.77% | 13.75% |
KURE.L KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index UCITS ETF USD | -10.32% | 11.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLV.L and KURE.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L — Risk / Return Rank
GXLV.L
KURE.L
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index UCITS ETF USD (KURE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXLV.L | KURE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.97 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | -0.27 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | -0.56 | +5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLV.L | KURE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -0.31 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -0.01 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLV.L drawdown since its inception was -19.59%, smaller than the maximum KURE.L drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLV.L and KURE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLV.L | KURE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.59% | -29.65% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -29.65% | +18.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -29.65% | +24.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -10.97% | +4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 14.42% | -5.35% |
Volatility
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L) is 5.53%, while KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index UCITS ETF USD (KURE.L) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that GXLV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KURE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLV.L | KURE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 6.97% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 17.88% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 26.43% | -7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 26.09% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 26.09% | -5.49% |
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLV.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than KURE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXLV.L vs. KURE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXLV.L nor KURE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLV.L and KURE.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLV.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLV.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and MLC Management. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLV.L and 0.65% for KURE.L.
Find the right allocation for GXLV.L and KURE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer