PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUES.L vs. USPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUES.L achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly higher than USPA.L's 6.42% return.


IUES.L

1D
0.75%
1M
5.21%
6M
21.22%
YTD
28.42%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
8.75%

USPA.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.37%
6M
6.70%
YTD
6.42%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.42%9.91%3.87%-0.66%63.84%51.95%4.82%
USPA.L
Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.42%15.76%26.74%30.46%-22.10%32.21%16.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IUES.L and USPA.L is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.24

The correlation between IUES.L and USPA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUES.L vs. USPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

USPA.L
USPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
USPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUES.LUSPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.60

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

6.04

-0.37

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUES.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the USPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUES.L and USPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.79%, which is greater than USPA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and USPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUES.LUSPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.79%

-27.78%

-39.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.33%

-10.58%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-18.86%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.98%

-27.78%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-1.85%

-7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-5.97%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.40%

2.80%

+3.60%

Volatility

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that IUES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUES.LUSPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

3.49%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

9.90%

+9.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

12.31%

+10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.74%

16.63%

+10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.53%

16.48%

+12.05%

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUES.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USPA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUES.L vs. USPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUES.L nor USPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUES.L and USPA.L have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUES.L.

IUES.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while USPA.L is S&P 500. IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while USPA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUES.L and 0.07% for USPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUES.L and USPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer