IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IUCS.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - IUCS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while XDPG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 GBP Hedged. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUCS.L returned 7.08%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for XDPG.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUCS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDPG.L.

Performance

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IUCS.L is traded in USD, while XDPG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDPG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUCS.L having a 7.95% return and XDPG.L slightly lower at 7.68%.

IUCS.L

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 5.13%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: —

XDPG.L

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 9.04%
• 1Y: 23.13%
• 3Y*: 23.95%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUCS.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	7.95%	3.91%	14.29%	-0.32%	-0.06%	18.15%	9.34%	26.76%	-9.14%	5.94%
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged	7.68%	25.78%	22.82%	31.41%	-29.20%	27.70%	18.76%	32.65%	-12.81%	24.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IUCS.L and XDPG.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between IUCS.L and XDPG.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUCS.L	XDPG.L
Consumer Defensive	99.0%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	10.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	11.2%
Energy	-	3.5%
Financial Services	-	11.8%
Healthcare	-	8.5%
Industrials	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	35.6%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUCS.L

IUCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
IUCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
IUCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
IUCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
IUCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

XDPG.L

XDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUCS.L	XDPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.55	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.35	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.27	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	1.82	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.15	7.16	-6.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUCS.L and XDPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUCS.L	XDPG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	1.55	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.53	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.51	+0.06

Drawdowns

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUCS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum XDPG.L drawdown of -43.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCS.L and XDPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUCS.L	XDPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.90%	-43.10%	+19.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.37%	-12.65%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-18.58%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.20%	-39.97%	+22.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	-2.62%	-4.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-9.01%	+4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	3.22%	+1.24%

Volatility

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) at 3.99%. This indicates that IUCS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUCS.L	XDPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	3.99%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.31%	11.17%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.88%	14.85%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	20.44%	-7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	21.10%	-7.26%

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUCS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUCS.L vs. XDPG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUCS.L nor XDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUCS.L and XDPG.L in my portfolio?

IUCS.L and XDPG.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUCS.L or XDPG.L?

On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUCS.L or XDPG.L?

XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUCS.L.

What is the main difference between IUCS.L and XDPG.L?

IUCS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XDPG.L is S&P 500. IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUCS.L and 0.09% for XDPG.L.