IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L
IUCS.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and EBIG.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - IUCS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index while EBIG.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IUCS.L returned 8.49%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for EBIG.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUCS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EBIG.L.
Performance
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUCS.L is traded in USD, while EBIG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EBIG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUCS.L achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly higher than EBIG.L's -15.71% return.
IUCS.L
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
EBIG.L
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- -15.71%
- 6M
- -16.03%
- 1Y
- -8.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCS.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.26% | 3.96% | 14.33% | -0.38% | -0.06% | 5.57% |
EBIG.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -15.71% | 18.24% | 30.80% | 31.55% | -41.58% | -36.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUCS.L and EBIG.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.19 |
The correlation between IUCS.L and EBIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUCS.L
EBIG.L
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUCS.L | EBIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.95 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | -0.30 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | -0.62 | +1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUCS.L | EBIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | -0.43 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | -0.31 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUCS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum EBIG.L drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCS.L and EBIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUCS.L | EBIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.90% | -67.33% | +43.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -27.12% | +17.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.00% | -27.12% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -36.32% | +28.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -44.92% | +40.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 13.16% | -8.75% |
Volatility
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) at 4.73%. This indicates that IUCS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUCS.L | EBIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 4.73% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 14.62% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 19.15% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 30.90% | -17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 30.90% | -15.91% |
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EBIG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUCS.L vs. EBIG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUCS.L nor EBIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUCS.L and EBIG.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIG.L.
IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while EBIG.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUCS.L and 0.50% for EBIG.L.
Find the right allocation for IUCS.L and EBIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer