PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUCS.L is traded in USD, while CSPE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CSPE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUCS.L achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly higher than CSPE.L's -2.60% return.


IUCS.L

1D
1.33%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
6.26%
6M
5.41%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

CSPE.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
-1.55%
3Y*
2.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IUCS.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
6.26%3.96%14.33%-0.38%-0.19%
CSPE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
-2.60%21.84%-7.65%3.48%-6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IUCS.L and CSPE.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.32

Over the past year, IUCS.L and CSPE.L have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUCS.L
IUCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPE.L
CSPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CSPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUCS.LCSPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.99

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.11

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

-0.25

+0.85

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the CSPE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUCS.L and CSPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUCS.LCSPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

-0.11

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.13

+0.47

Drawdowns

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUCS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, which is greater than CSPE.L's maximum drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCS.L and CSPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUCS.LCSPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-19.30%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-13.99%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.00%

-15.85%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-12.25%

+4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-6.57%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

6.08%

-1.67%

Volatility

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSPE.L) at 5.26%. This indicates that IUCS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUCS.LCSPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

5.26%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

11.54%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

14.39%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

19.17%

-5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

19.17%

-4.18%

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUCS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUCS.L vs. CSPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUCS.L nor CSPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUCS.L and CSPE.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUCS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUCS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CSPE.L.

IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while CSPE.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUCS.L and 0.18% for CSPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUCS.L and CSPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer