PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUCS.L is traded in USD, while 5ESG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 5ESG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUCS.L achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than 5ESG.L's 8.47% return.


IUCS.L

1D
1.33%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
6.26%
6M
5.41%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

5ESG.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
2.99%
YTD
8.47%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
23.98%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUCS.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
6.26%3.96%14.33%-0.38%-0.06%18.15%9.27%13.63%
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
8.47%27.18%21.56%32.83%-28.76%30.39%20.59%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IUCS.L and 5ESG.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between IUCS.L and 5ESG.L has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUCS.L
5ESG.L

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Communication Services

-

14.5%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

12.0%

Healthcare

-

9.3%

Industrials

-

6.8%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Technology

-

38.6%

Utilities

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

IUCS.L
99.0%
5ESG.L
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IUCS.L
1.0%
5ESG.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
1.9%

Communication Services

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
14.5%

Energy

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
4.2%

Financial Services

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
12.0%

Healthcare

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
9.3%

Industrials

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
6.8%

Real Estate

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
2.2%

Technology

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
38.6%

Utilities

IUCS.L

-

5ESG.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUCS.L
IUCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUCS.L5ESG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.35

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

2.22

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

9.01

-8.42

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUCS.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUCS.L5ESG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

1.99

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Drawdowns

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUCS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -40.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCS.L and 5ESG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUCS.L5ESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-40.04%

+16.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-13.02%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.00%

-19.80%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.20%

-40.04%

+22.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-1.03%

-7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-8.46%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

3.22%

+1.19%

Volatility

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 4.07%. This indicates that IUCS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUCS.L5ESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

4.07%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

10.93%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

14.55%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

21.20%

-7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

24.80%

-9.81%

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUCS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUCS.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

IUCS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.63%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%
IUCS.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUCS.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUCS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUCS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

IUCS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUCS.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUCS.L and 5ESG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer