PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUCM.L is traded in USD, while QDVK.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVK.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUCM.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than QDVK.DE's -1.26% return.


IUCM.L

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.52%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*

QDVK.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-1.26%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.60%26.48%38.98%55.75%-40.54%22.36%22.64%30.83%-10.96%
QDVK.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.26%7.13%30.68%43.29%-37.46%24.80%32.64%29.09%-16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IUCM.L and QDVK.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between IUCM.L and QDVK.DE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUCM.L
IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVK.DE
QDVK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
QDVK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUCM.LQDVK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.12

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.80

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

2.43

+5.36

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the QDVK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUCM.L and QDVK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUCM.LQDVK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.65

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.35

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.57

+0.16

Drawdowns

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than QDVK.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCM.L and QDVK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUCM.LQDVK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.32%

-40.75%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-14.80%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-27.40%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.32%

-40.75%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-4.75%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-8.83%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

4.88%

-2.21%

Volatility

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) is 4.40%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that IUCM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUCM.LQDVK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.86%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

13.77%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

18.21%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

22.59%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

20.95%

-0.61%

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUCM.L and QDVK.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUCM.L vs. QDVK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUCM.L nor QDVK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUCM.L and QDVK.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUCM.L and QDVK.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IUCM.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while QDVK.DE is Consumer Staples Equities. IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while QDVK.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUCM.L and QDVK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer