PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUCM.L is traded in USD, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUCM.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.50% return.


IUCM.L

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.52%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*

PQVG.L

1D
0.41%
1M
4.47%
YTD
16.50%
6M
17.93%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.60%26.48%38.98%55.75%-40.54%22.36%22.64%30.83%-10.96%
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
16.50%13.83%30.09%6.31%0.51%26.62%7.64%26.02%-14.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IUCM.L and PQVG.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between IUCM.L and PQVG.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUCM.L
PQVG.L

Communication Services

99.1%
10.4%

Technology

0.6%
24.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

21.8%

Healthcare

-

9.5%

Industrials

-

15.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.8%

Communication Services

IUCM.L
99.1%
PQVG.L
10.4%

Technology

IUCM.L
0.6%
PQVG.L
24.3%

Basic Materials

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
5.6%

Energy

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
5.6%

Financial Services

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
21.8%

Healthcare

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
9.5%

Industrials

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
15.6%

Real Estate

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L

-

Utilities

IUCM.L

-

PQVG.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUCM.L
IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUCM.LPQVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

4.49

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

15.68

-7.90

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUCM.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUCM.LPQVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.15

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.97

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.88

-0.16

Drawdowns

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCM.L and PQVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUCM.LPQVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.32%

-33.94%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-5.07%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-15.73%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.32%

-17.27%

-30.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-0.06%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-3.96%

-6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.45%

+1.22%

Volatility

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that IUCM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUCM.LPQVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

2.65%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

8.21%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

10.59%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

15.89%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

16.92%

+3.42%

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUCM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUCM.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

IUCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.82%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.87%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUCM.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUCM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

IUCM.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUCM.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUCM.L and PQVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer