PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Industria de Diseno Textil SA (ITX.MC) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITX.MC achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than ENEL.MI's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ITX.MC has underperformed ENEL.MI with an annualized return of 9.78%, while ENEL.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.79% annualized return.


ITX.MC

1D
1.12%
1M
14.05%
YTD
0.99%
6M
2.04%
1Y
25.19%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
15.76%
10Y*
9.78%

ENEL.MI

1D
1.35%
1M
0.51%
YTD
13.01%
6M
15.09%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
24.05%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
15.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITX.MC
Industria de Diseno Textil SA
0.99%17.50%29.15%63.56%-9.81%11.63%-16.11%44.41%-21.19%-8.93%
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
13.01%36.75%8.35%42.63%-23.74%-11.11%22.02%47.36%2.97%27.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ITX.MC and ENEL.MI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between ITX.MC and ENEL.MI has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITX.MC
ITX.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ITX.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITX.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITX.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITX.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITX.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industria de Diseno Textil SA (ITX.MC) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITX.MCENEL.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.65

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

7.83

-3.94

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITX.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITX.MC and ENEL.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITX.MC drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ENEL.MI drawdown of -56.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITX.MC and ENEL.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITX.MCENEL.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-56.40%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-10.99%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.24%

-13.88%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

-47.08%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.68%

-50.13%

+8.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-3.93%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-15.15%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

3.72%

+2.25%

Volatility

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Volatility Comparison

Industria de Diseno Textil SA (ITX.MC) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) at 5.33%. This indicates that ITX.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENEL.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITX.MCENEL.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

5.33%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.70%

17.28%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

19.27%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.23%

21.09%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

22.78%

+3.01%

Dividends

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Dividend Comparison

ITX.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than ENEL.MI's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
4.95%4.98%5.44%5.56%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%4.70%3.51%3.82%3.60%
ITX.MC
Industria de Diseno Textil SA
3.07%2.98%2.51%2.47%3.03%1.99%1.09%2.27%2.72%1.90%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ITX.MC vs. ENEL.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Industria de Diseno Textil SA and Enel SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ITX.MC and ENEL.MI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITX.MC and ENEL.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer