ITWO vs. LQTI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).

ITWO and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITWO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.

Performance

ITWO vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ITWO vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	2.68%	11.34%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.44%	6.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITWO achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's -0.44% return.

ITWO

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -3.80%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 4.87%
• 1Y: 26.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITWO vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

ITWO

Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF

Return for Risk

ITWO vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITWO

ITWO Risk / Return Rank: 66
ITWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ITWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ITWO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ITWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ITWO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 36
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITWO vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITWO	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	0.74	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.02	+0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.14	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	1.37	+0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	4.15	+3.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITWO vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITWO and LQTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITWO	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	0.74	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.90	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between ITWO and LQTI is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ITWO vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	11.41%	12.12%	4.11%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ITWO vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITWO	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.77%	-3.41%	-21.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-3.41%	-9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.08%	-2.03%	-4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.58%	-0.78%	-4.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	1.12%	+2.55%

Volatility

ITWO vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 2.66%. This indicates that ITWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITWO	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	2.66%	+4.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.59%	3.87%	+10.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.89%	6.23%	+15.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	6.11%	+14.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.74%	6.11%	+14.63%