ITWO vs. JELM
ITWO (Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and JELM (Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ITWO is passively managed, while JELM is actively managed. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ITWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JELM.
Performance
ITWO vs. JELM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ITWO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- YTD
- 23.91%
- 1Y
- 38.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.88%
JELM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.12M | $1.31M | $1.40M | |
| $199.95K | $786.17K | $963.17K |
ITWO vs. JELM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 10.50% |
JELM Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITWO and JELM is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITWO vs. JELM — Risk / Return Rank
ITWO
JELM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITWO vs. JELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF (JELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITWO | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITWO vs. JELM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, which is greater than JELM's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and JELM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITWO | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -0.69% | -24.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.25% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -0.21% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility
ITWO vs. JELM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITWO | JELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 3.69% | +15.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 3.69% | +16.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 3.69% | +16.58% |
ITWO vs. JELM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than JELM's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITWO vs. JELM - Dividend Comparison
ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than JELM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 7.35% | 12.12% | 4.11% |
JELM Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITWO and JELM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITWO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITWO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JELM.
ITWO has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 1.21% for JELM.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ITWO and 0.59% for JELM.
Find the right allocation for ITWO and JELM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer