PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ITWN.L is traded in GBp, while V3PB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3PB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITWN.L achieves a 67.93% return, which is significantly higher than V3PB.L's 30.39% return.


ITWN.L

1D
-1.63%
1M
14.84%
YTD
67.93%
6M
73.48%
1Y
117.37%
3Y*
40.47%
5Y*
22.94%
10Y*
23.12%

V3PB.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
10.60%
YTD
30.39%
6M
32.51%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ITWN.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
67.93%22.61%25.77%21.84%4.11%
V3PB.L
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
30.39%21.87%3.24%8.19%-6.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ITWN.L and V3PB.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.59

The correlation between ITWN.L and V3PB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITWN.L
ITWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ITWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

V3PB.L
V3PB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITWN.LV3PB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.56

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.46

4.52

+7.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.79

16.28

+18.51

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITWN.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.10, which is higher than the V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITWN.L and V3PB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITWN.LV3PB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.10

3.00

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.94

-0.30

Drawdowns

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITWN.L drawdown since its inception was -48.27%, which is greater than V3PB.L's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWN.L and V3PB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITWN.LV3PB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.27%

-15.03%

-33.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-11.95%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-15.03%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.23%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-3.40%

-5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.33%

+0.03%

Volatility

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) at 7.65%. This indicates that ITWN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3PB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITWN.LV3PB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

7.65%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.60%

15.68%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.88%

18.00%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.77%

15.95%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

15.95%

+4.60%

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITWN.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PB.L's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITWN.L vs. V3PB.L - Dividend Comparison

ITWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while V3PB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITWN.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.89%1.50%1.37%2.14%3.54%1.33%1.83%2.28%2.72%2.74%2.86%3.23%
V3PB.L
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITWN.L and V3PB.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3PB.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3PB.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ITWN.L.

ITWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while V3PB.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ITWN.L and 0.17% for V3PB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITWN.L and V3PB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer