ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L
ITPA.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) and 0TPE.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares - ITPA.L tracks the BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD) while 0TPE.L tracks the Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ITPA.L returned 2.86% vs -0.16% for 0TPE.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ITPA.L is traded in GBP, while 0TPE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0TPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITPA.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than 0TPE.L's -2.30% return.
ITPA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
0TPE.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- -0.16%
- 3Y*
- 1.22%
- 5Y*
- -1.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ITPA.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.55% | 6.54% | 1.72% |
0TPE.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -2.30% | 10.06% | -2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITPA.L and 0TPE.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITPA.L
0TPE.L
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITPA.L | 0TPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.00 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | -0.03 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | -0.09 | +4.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITPA.L drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum 0TPE.L drawdown of -17.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPA.L and 0TPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITPA.L | 0TPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -17.83% | +13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.86% | -4.91% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -10.83% | +9.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -8.50% | +7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 1.90% | -1.21% |
Volatility
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) is 0.77%, while iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that ITPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0TPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITPA.L | 0TPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 1.70% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 3.93% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55% | 5.33% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 9.65% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 10.82% | -5.96% |
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITPA.L and 0TPE.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITPA.L vs. 0TPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ITPA.L nor 0TPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ITPA.L and 0TPE.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITPA.L and 0TPE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
ITPA.L tracks BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD), while 0TPE.L tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index.
Find the right allocation for ITPA.L and 0TPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer