ITOT vs. JEPQ
ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ITOT returned 21.07%/yr vs 20.04%/yr for JEPQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITOT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.44% return.
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 9.09% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -7.51% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and JEPQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ITOT and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITOT
JEPQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
ITOT
JEPQ
Financial Services
ITOT
JEPQ
Communication Services
ITOT
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
ITOT
JEPQ
Industrials
ITOT
JEPQ
Healthcare
ITOT
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
ITOT
JEPQ
Energy
ITOT
JEPQ
Real Estate
ITOT
JEPQ
Utilities
ITOT
JEPQ
Basic Materials
ITOT
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOT vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
ITOT
JEPQ
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITOT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.95 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 14.33 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.13 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.96 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -20.07% | -35.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -8.82% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -20.07% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -2.02% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -3.42% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.81% | +0.14% |
Volatility
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 3.65%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.65% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 9.66% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 12.19% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 16.67% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 16.67% | +1.62% |
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITOT vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than JEPQ's 10.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ITOT and JEPQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITOT has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 21.07% vs 20.04% for JEPQ. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 21.07% return vs 20.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 1.00% for ITOT.
ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITOT and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer