ITOT vs. GLD
ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITOT returned 14.99%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITOT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
ITOT vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ITOT has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 14.99%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
ITOT vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 9.69% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and GLD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | 0.07 |
The correlation between ITOT and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITOT vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITOT
GLD
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
ITOT
GLD
-
Financial Services
ITOT
GLD
-
Communication Services
ITOT
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITOT
GLD
-
Industrials
ITOT
GLD
-
Healthcare
ITOT
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
ITOT
GLD
-
Energy
ITOT
GLD
-
Real Estate
ITOT
GLD
-
Utilities
ITOT
GLD
-
Basic Materials
ITOT
GLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOT vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
ITOT
GLD
ITOT vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITOT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 0.98 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 2.81 | +9.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.20% | -45.56% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -24.46% | +15.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -24.46% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -24.46% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -24.46% | -10.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -22.05% | +19.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -16.16% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 8.49% | -6.50% |
Volatility
ITOT vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 4.57%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOT | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 7.79% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 24.10% | -14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 27.37% | -14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 18.22% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 16.08% | +2.21% |
ITOT vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITOT vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.99% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITOT and GLD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to ITOT (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.99% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLD is Gold. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.40% for GLD.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITOT and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer