PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. FFEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2030 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than FFEGX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ITOT has outperformed FFEGX with an annualized return of 15.01%, while FFEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%

FFEGX

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.40%
YTD
7.43%
6M
7.77%
1Y
18.33%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%
FFEGX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2030 Fund Institutional Premium Class
7.43%15.93%9.55%15.16%-16.81%10.94%14.38%22.10%-5.55%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and FFEGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.94

The correlation between ITOT and FFEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. FFEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FFEGX
FFEGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2030 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITOTFFEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.94

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.92

12.96

+1.97

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FFEGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and FFEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITOTFFEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.38

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.61

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.81

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.72

-0.15

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than FFEGX's maximum drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and FFEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTFFEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-23.85%

-31.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.43%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-9.36%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-23.26%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-23.85%

-11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.58%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-4.16%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.46%

+0.48%

Volatility

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index 2030 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEGX) at 2.70%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTFFEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.70%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

6.48%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

7.95%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

10.31%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

11.22%

+7.04%

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FFEGX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITOT vs. FFEGX - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FFEGX's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFEGX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2030 Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.08%3.37%2.71%2.31%2.45%2.22%2.43%16.77%2.18%1.88%2.00%2.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ITOT and FFEGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FFEGX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs FFEGX's -23.85%.

FFEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and FFEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer