PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 16.99% return.


ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%

AVGV

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.06%
YTD
16.99%
6M
18.62%
1Y
36.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%9.73%
AVGV
Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
16.99%22.57%11.26%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and AVGV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.83

The correlation between ITOT and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITOT vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITOT
AVGV

Technology

33.8%
10.5%

Financial Services

12.1%
21.6%

Communication Services

10.3%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
14.5%

Industrials

9.5%
16.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.5%

Energy

3.7%
13.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.8%

Utilities

2.3%
0.7%

Basic Materials

2.1%
7.3%

Technology

ITOT
33.8%
AVGV
10.5%

Financial Services

ITOT
12.1%
AVGV
21.6%

Communication Services

ITOT
10.3%
AVGV
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
10.1%
AVGV
14.5%

Industrials

ITOT
9.5%
AVGV
16.1%

Healthcare

ITOT
9.0%
AVGV
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.7%
AVGV
5.5%

Energy

ITOT
3.7%
AVGV
13.6%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.4%
AVGV
0.8%

Utilities

ITOT
2.3%
AVGV
0.7%

Basic Materials

ITOT
2.1%
AVGV
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITOTAVGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.52

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.57

17.72

-3.15

ITOT vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITOTAVGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.84

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.46

-0.89

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-17.03%

-38.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.12%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.48%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-2.30%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.07%

-0.13%

Volatility

ITOT vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 2.99%, while Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.66%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

9.86%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

12.94%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

14.97%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

14.97%

+3.29%

ITOT vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITOT vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than AVGV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGV
Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF
1.89%1.98%2.32%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITOT and AVGV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGV has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 36.52% vs 28.12% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 36.52% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.

ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVGV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer