PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 19.44% return.


ITOT

1D
1.46%
1M
1.37%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.61%
ALL TIME*
10.62%

AVGV

1D
1.06%
1M
2.01%
6M
11.09%
YTD
19.44%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.38M$4.64M$3.97M
$218.20M$235.22M$304.20M

ITOT vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.00%23.80%10.25%
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
19.44%22.57%11.26%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and AVGV is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.83

The correlation between ITOT and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITOT vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITOT
AVGV

Technology

36.4%
11.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
24.0%

Industrials

9.9%
16.3%

Healthcare

9.5%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
14.4%

Communication Services

9.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.0%

Energy

3.1%
11.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.7%

Utilities

2.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
6.6%

Technology

ITOT
36.4%
AVGV
11.8%

Financial Services

ITOT
11.9%
AVGV
24.0%

Industrials

ITOT
9.9%
AVGV
16.3%

Healthcare

ITOT
9.5%
AVGV
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
9.5%
AVGV
14.4%

Communication Services

ITOT
9.1%
AVGV
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.3%
AVGV
5.0%

Energy

ITOT
3.1%
AVGV
11.5%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.3%
AVGV
0.7%

Utilities

ITOT
2.2%
AVGV
0.6%

Basic Materials

ITOT
1.9%
AVGV
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITOT vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITOTAVGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.37

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

17.10

-5.69

ITOT vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-17.03%

-38.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.12%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-17.03%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-2.23%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.07%

0.00%

Volatility

ITOT vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) at 3.10%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.10%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

10.27%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

13.24%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

14.87%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

14.87%

+3.41%

ITOT vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITOT vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than AVGV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
1.60%1.98%2.32%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITOT and AVGV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to AVGV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 20.38% vs 20.17% for AVGV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 20.38% return vs 20.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.99% for ITOT.

ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVGV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer