ITEQ vs. CHPS
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITEQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ITEQ returned 27.92% vs 223.67% for CHPS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 13.71% | 11.70% | -3.66% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and CHPS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ITEQ and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
CHPS
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
CHPS
Industrials
ITEQ
CHPS
Utilities
ITEQ
CHPS
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
CHPS
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
CHPS
-
Healthcare
ITEQ
CHPS
-
Energy
ITEQ
CHPS
Communication Services
ITEQ
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
CHPS
-
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
CHPS
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.81 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 12.87 | -10.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 49.99 | -44.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 6.54 | -5.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.81 | -1.38 |
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -39.44% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -17.50% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | 0.00% | -13.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -9.16% | -9.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 4.50% | +0.36% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 7.71%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 14.18% | -6.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 28.19% | -10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 34.43% | -11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 33.78% | -8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 33.78% | -10.38% |
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and CHPS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to ITEQ (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 27.92% for ITEQ. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 27.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.
ITEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer