ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ITEC.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF) and FCBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from State Street and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITEC.L returned 15.12%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for FCBR.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITEC.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FCBR.L.

Performance

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ITEC.L is traded in EUR, while FCBR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FCBR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEC.L achieves a 50.84% return, which is significantly higher than FCBR.L's 26.66% return.

ITEC.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 20.47%
• YTD: 50.84%
• 6M: 47.59%
• 1Y: 59.63%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 16.38%

FCBR.L

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: 29.67%
• YTD: 26.66%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 19.52%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 15.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ITEC.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF	50.84%	9.68%	8.54%	34.99%	-28.19%	35.95%	17.86%
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	26.66%	-5.27%	26.77%	35.82%	-23.05%	29.30%	27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEC.L and FCBR.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020	0.57

The correlation between ITEC.L and FCBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEC.L

ITEC.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
ITEC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ITEC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ITEC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ITEC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ITEC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FCBR.L

FCBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
FCBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FCBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FCBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FCBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FCBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITEC.L	FCBR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	0.77	+1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	1.23	+1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.16	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	0.81	+3.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	1.89	+10.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FCBR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEC.L and FCBR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITEC.L	FCBR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	0.77	+1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.66	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.74	-0.10

Drawdowns

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEC.L drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, which is greater than FCBR.L's maximum drawdown of -29.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEC.L and FCBR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITEC.L	FCBR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.49%	-29.07%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-24.04%	+10.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.94%	-29.07%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.49%	-29.07%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-3.16%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-9.96%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	10.29%	-5.34%

Volatility

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L) is 10.27%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) has a volatility of 11.54%. This indicates that ITEC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITEC.L	FCBR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.27%	11.54%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.59%	21.92%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.53%	25.17%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.71%	23.58%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.09%	23.45%	+0.64%

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEC.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITEC.L vs. FCBR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ITEC.L nor FCBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITEC.L and FCBR.L in my portfolio?

ITEC.L and FCBR.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ITEC.L or FCBR.L?

On fees, ITEC.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITEC.L or FCBR.L?

ITEC.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCBR.L.

What is the main difference between ITEC.L and FCBR.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ITEC.L and 0.60% for FCBR.L.