PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITEB.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEB.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLTS.L's 0.68% return.


ITEB.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.92%
6M
-0.22%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
10Y*

GLTS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.14%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
0.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ITEB.L
iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.50%5.10%6.13%10.70%0.86%
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
0.68%5.40%1.76%3.70%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEB.L and GLTS.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.59

The correlation between ITEB.L and GLTS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEB.L
ITEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ITEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTS.L
GLTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITEB.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITEB.LGLTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

1.17

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

3.56

-1.34

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEB.L and GLTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEB.L drawdown since its inception was -5.97%, smaller than the maximum GLTS.L drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEB.L and GLTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEB.LGLTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-11.18%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-2.22%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.03%

-2.22%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.55%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.71%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.73%

+0.56%

Volatility

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITEB.L) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) at 0.71%. This indicates that ITEB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITEB.LGLTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.71%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.19%

2.07%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.81%

2.40%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

3.11%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

2.52%

+3.67%

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEB.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITEB.L vs. GLTS.L - Dividend Comparison

ITEB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than GLTS.L's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLTS.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF
3.62%3.44%2.74%1.30%0.18%0.13%0.46%0.60%0.39%0.52%0.88%0.98%
ITEB.L
iShares Italy Govt Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.87%2.81%2.58%2.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITEB.L and GLTS.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLTS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLTS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ITEB.L.

ITEB.L tracks Bloomberg Italy Treasury Bond Index, while GLTS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ITEB.L and 0.15% for GLTS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITEB.L and GLTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer