PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDJ vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDJ vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDJ achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.


ITDJ

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.67%
YTD
12.33%
6M
12.14%
1Y
29.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDJ vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
12.33%22.02%-1.70%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%5.66%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDJ and IBID is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDJ vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDJ
ITDJ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDJ vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITDJIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.75

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

8.22

-5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

30.99

-17.78

ITDJ vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDJ and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITDJ vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDJ drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDJ and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDJIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-1.28%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-0.49%

-9.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.49%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-0.22%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

0.13%

+2.10%

Volatility

ITDJ vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that ITDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDJIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

0.35%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

0.86%

+10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

1.23%

+12.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

2.24%

+14.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

2.24%

+14.09%

ITDJ vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDJ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDJ vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

ITDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
ITDJ
iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
1.25%1.40%0.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDJ and IBID have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITDJ has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDJ dropped -16.63% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, ITDJ leads with 29.36% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDJ has performed better with a 29.36% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITDJ.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.25% for ITDJ.

ITDJ is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITDJ and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDJ and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer